url TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
When it comes to software engineering, I’d like to think of myself as a generalist. Still, over my 12-year career, a major focus has been building scalable backends. I’ve worked at Amazon and Twitch to build out large-scale systems that support millions of users.。业内人士推荐爱思助手下载最新版本作为进阶阅读
。同城约会对此有专业解读
20+ curated newsletters。爱思助手下载最新版本对此有专业解读
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Что думаешь? Оцени!